A young son of an uber-Elder was doing a demo about his school Witnessing and in a very serious and intense voice said, 'I explianed to him about the paradise ... and he took it well'.
Maybe you had to be there, but the whole congo just cracked up!
a couple of years ago during the km meeting the day of the memorial was announced, location and time.
the announcement was followed by a km article review re: the memorial (question & answer).
my daughter was 5 at that time and had been dozing off & on.
A young son of an uber-Elder was doing a demo about his school Witnessing and in a very serious and intense voice said, 'I explianed to him about the paradise ... and he took it well'.
Maybe you had to be there, but the whole congo just cracked up!
i have a gap in my knowledge re some of the procedures that come into play when someone decides that they simply don't want to be a witness any more.
just to explain:.
in my dub years, there were any number of ex-witnesses around.
I guess stories like: "I'm outraged! The elders left me alone and didn't do anything after I fobbed them off about not going to meetings for a month/year/decade", or "Can you believe what happened!! I didn't get a shepherding visit/judicial committee/third degree on schedule after I quietly and politely slipped away causing no ripples" aren't very memorable and don't leave the impression the more dramatic stories of inequity do.
My recollection from the Shepherding work was that there were quite a few people around who no longer believed but lived quiet lives and caused no problems just as you described. We just called on them out of duty and (an odd form of) courtesy.
Those you describe who just dont believe probably dont talk about it much.
Cheers, Max (who did a rapid-fade, and now lives a quiet life in the country away from the urban hurly-burly where those three might meet again to revisit battles neither lost nor won...)
(Edited to replace punctuation that vanished into the ether)
Edited by - Max Divergent on 4 August 2002 1:2:16
have any of you here, either by word of mouth or personal experience, heard of entire congregations being disfellowshipped, or nearly entire congregations, like say 50% or more?
thank you for your support in this all important survey .
from apostate central, ri .
There was a circut in Australia that had two consecutive CO's DF'd while they were serving in around 1995/6 ish.
*laughing just thinking about it*.
did anybody out there lie on their service reports that they maintained the 'national average' when in reality you got .005 hours of service in any given month?
i magically always used to always get "10" hours out in service, while nobody ever saw me at the groups, no one ever caught on, or seemed not to -- maybe they just didn't give a shit.. i always lied so i could keep my microphone 'privelidges' -- that being, the privelidge to walk around at the back of the hall giving my deflated ass a break from those awful chairs they had.
I remember the scepticisim of the Service Overseer at some of the reports of the older sisters! The speculation was that they counted their preperation time, travel time, thinking time... but it never twigged to this naive twit that they probably just made half of it up (some of them bought 20+ mags a months though, so they paid for their sins...)!
If 'd have twigged earlier, I'd have started doing it a lot, lot earlier than I did! It was only the last six or so months for me. It just neve occured to me to do anything but be conservitive with what I counted - dumb ass!!
Max (not so) Divergent
were you more liberal that your jw peers?.
a 2001 survey asked for a response to the statement: "i believe homosexuality is immoral".
based on the religion of the respondents, it found that found that 84% of jws responded 'yes', compared to 20% of jews, 30% of 'no religion', and 48% of americans and 36% of australians overall.
Hi - Justa quick reply to some of the major points:
1. The stats for other faiths is at the link.
2. Even though the bible read litrally says what it says, many religious people don't take the bible literally and wouldn't conclude that makes homosexuality immoral in the 21st Century, although JW's do. Ture enough, this makes them more complient with the written word that other faiths, but many would argue that formal compliance with the written word dosn't make them more Christian or more moral than people who take a less literal approach to it. 3. Yeah, I guess 16% didn't tow the party line! Could be some polling irregularities in there, but it's still a lot. Thanks for your comments. Cheers, Max of the Divergent class
were you more liberal that your jw peers?.
a 2001 survey asked for a response to the statement: "i believe homosexuality is immoral".
based on the religion of the respondents, it found that found that 84% of jws responded 'yes', compared to 20% of jews, 30% of 'no religion', and 48% of americans and 36% of australians overall.
Were you more liberal that your JW peers?
A 2001 survey asked for a response to the statement: "I believe homosexuality is immoral". Based on the religion of the respondents, it found that found that 84% of JWs responded 'Yes', compared to 20% of Jews, 30% of 'No religion', and 48% of Americans and 36% of Australians overall. JW and Mormons (83%) had the strongest belief that homosexuality was immoral.
The point is that if you had a more liberal view on that question to 84% of your JW peers, you really didn't fit in as a Witness, and you probably had a whole bunch of other divergent views too. So, it's just as well you're out isn't it!!
Source is the reputable Roy Morgan: http://www.roymorgan.com.au/international/pressreleases/2001/article19.html
yes, it's number 13 in a series of weekend polls designed to brighten your day on a lazy sunday afternoon!
this weekend's poll topic invites us to do some market research!
the question is prompted by the recently published findings of the national church life survey (australia) conducted in 2001. all church attenders were asked their highest educational qualification.
I really couldn't remember. Of all the hundreds of JW I knew, I can only think of about two or three with Postgrad quals (ie: <0.5%) - none in my congo. Very few had degrees, the only one in my cong was a teacher who worked as a painter. Many of the men had trade quals, but that varied between congos. To the best of my memory and knowledge, <2% had degrees (ie: less than 2 in each Congo of 100), maybe 30% had trade or other vocational quals, the remainder secondary school only.
While it's a bit churlish to imply that JW are dumb or under-achievers or are predominantly part of lower socio-economic grouping or whatever, it's interesting to note where people are at in the big picture of things. Religion is a big part of people's identity and it's probably legitimate to hypothosise that people's religious identity will be reflected in key indicators of their work, education, political leaning (even neutrals usually have a leaning).
The point is: If you don't fit into the 'mold', you may not fit in to the group.
On that note, a survey qustion I though was interesting I found intersting found little variation between US, NZ and Aust responses to the question: "Obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues children should learn". Source: http://www.roymorgan.com.au/polls/2001/3414/index.html
While a majority of the general community said 'Yes', demographics that answered overwhelmingly 'YES!!!' (>60%) included those with =< Secondary school education only, people with low incomes and people who voted for conservitive and further right parties (and I can only presume a massive majority of JWs).
Demographics that gave a strong 'NO!' (>60%) had university education, had high incomes and voted for the Greens or other leftish Progressive parties.
I clearly and comfortably fall into the latter demographic (have 1 degree, working on the 2nd; higher than average income (at last!) and member of a progressive party (Australian Democrats). Maybe that's an indicator that I never fitted into the JW's.
In fact it could be said I was Divergent to the Max.
Cheers
.
here's a nice sickly sweet article from fl about the tireless efforts of the local neighbourhood witnessess working for your salvation despite terrible persecution... i really liked the bit where a lady who takes in stray cats and dogs also invited the jw's in!.
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/07/11/floridian/the_other_side_of_the.shtml
Here's a nice sickly sweet article from Fl about the tireless efforts of the local neighbourhood Witnessess working for your salvation despite terrible persecution... I really liked the bit where a lady who takes in stray cats and dogs also invited the JW's in!
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/07/11/Floridian/The_other_side_of_the.shtml
i know this is a subject that has been discussed at length on this board.
until now i went along with "not playing their game" and not daing.
now after bill bowen has been disfellowshipped i am feeling embarrassed and ashamed to ever have been associated with this unloving, hypocritical, corrupt organization.
I decided that I decide my religious identity, not some administrative process set by the JW for their own purposes. I took a pragmatice view that DA/DF would be inconvenient for weddings, funerals and things, so I've just made a 'heart de-dedication' and have let my actions speak rather than rely on an 'official' JW announcement of the fact that I've nothing whatever to do with them anymore.
But that's just me. You may view it differently. Prisca's comment was amusing, as we doubted more and more, the bedroom certainly became a den of pornia! I think that was somthing that just said to us 'get outta here!' (but never any prayers for forgivness!!!!).
Good luck, Max
omg i am like super wicked....
http://test.thespark.com/puritytest/.
you are 29% pure!
The dubs taught me well: I'm 77% pure, will have sex with 2 people (both female, but the one to come, I won't love... mmmm), and I'll live to be 88. At 42 (pending some very unlikey events occuring) I'll be a millionaire (ok, so maybe the dubs lessons didn't stick so well... )
Fun stuff.. Max